1920–1944
Figurative origins: the world still visible
General logic: Breuillaud constructs a solid relationship with reality—drawing, composition, the craft of paint—while already pushing matter and space beyond mere depiction.
1920–1929 | Training and first affirmations
A figuration still “classical”, but already energetic.
The importance of drawing and compositional grounding.
Colour serves volume, without yet becoming autonomous.
1929–1936 | Montmartre / the “human period”
Popular subjects: streets, markets, caravans, modest figures.
Heightened expressivity: thicker paint, tensions of planes, faces sometimes “torn”.
Reality is less described than sensed.
1936–1944 | Constructed figuration, densification
The canvas becomes more architectural.
Space closes in and compacts: a sense of mass, gravity, sometimes nocturne.
An interest in internal structures can already be felt—preparing the post-war shift.
Visual markers: readable figuration, solid masses, more present matter, “inhabited” colours.
1945–1954
Provence: landscape as structure (PR periods)
General logic: the landscape is no longer a motif; it becomes a system. Breuillaud learns to “summarise”: planes, rhythms, balances.
PR1 (c. 1945–1949) | Reconstructed landscape
Simplification of forms.
Volumes organise into blocks; drawing becomes more synthetic.
PR2 (c. 1950–1954) | Geometrised landscape / hinge
The subject de-embodies: houses, hills, trees become modules.
Colour begins to act as a spatial force.
This is the launch ramp for the “formal mutation”.
Visual markers: coloured planes, firm construction; the motif is still legible but begins to “decompose”.
1955–1961
The “formal mutation”: from the constructed world to the generated world (MP1 → MP3, then filament threshold)
Here Breuillaud leaves the motif behind: he no longer paints “what is”, but “what is forming”.
MP1 (c. 1955–1956) | Deconstruction of landscape
Reality breaks into units.
Curvatures appear; internal tensions; “signs”.
MP2 (c. 1956–1958) | Organisation by masses + organic push
Masses become almost anatomical.
The palette intensifies; space becomes a field of pressures.
MP3 (c. 1958–1959) | Pre-organic / embryonic
A core of your present corpus: proto-organisms, vortices, pockets, nuclei.
The canvas functions like an incubation: forms in growth, fusion/dissociation.
It is the matrix of almost everything that follows.
1960–1961 | “Filament” threshold / proto-cosmic
Masses open into networks, lines, meshes.
The question becomes: how does a form hold when it is made of flows?
Visual markers: disappearance of the motif; birth of nuclei, membranes, embryonic forms, then lines/networks.
1962–1966
The living appears: translucent scenes, embryology, then the monumental turn
General logic: the organic is no longer latent; it becomes iconography.
1962–1963 | Organisms and “scenes”
More ensemble-like compositions emerge (without returning to classical figuration).
Transparencies, luminous epidermis, red/black tensions, dissolved figures.
The canvas becomes a biological theatre.
1964 | Hinge year
Stabilisation of certain motifs: “masks”, “monsters”, maternity (as iconography).
The language is solid enough to deploy in large formats and series.
1965–1966 | Consolidation and rise in power
1965: membrane threshold, inner light, “chamber” spaces.
1966: the MP4 cycle ignites: telluric densities, nocturnes, monumentality.
Visual markers: the figure is not “human”, but it is there—masks, embryos, scenes, entities.
1966–1972
MP4 then CC: the great nocturnal / telluric painting and the cosmic opening
General logic: Breuillaud now paints complete worlds—matter, crowds of entities, depth, verticality.
MP4 (1966–early 1967) | Nocturnes, density, visions
Red, black, deep blue.
Suspended bodies, “darkness”, curtains, limbo, figures under compression.
Monumentality: the canvas becomes a total space.
1967 | Major synthesis
Large-format structuring works (crucible, ascending forms).
The organic becomes cosmology.
1969–1972 | Shifts of palette and space
Entries of more open fields, sometimes yellows, sometimes more aerial.
Entities cease to be “born in matter”: they circulate toward an autonomous space.
Visual markers: large formats, verticalities, magma, crowds of entities, then more open/cosmological spaces.
1972–1980
CCL: the final cycle — spectral, erotic, circular, fusion-like
General logic: painting becomes more concentrated—less “world”, more “nucleus”. Themes of condensation, halo, union.
1972–1974 | Nuclei / spectres / blue medusae
Red foci, blue halos, spectral forms.
The living becomes an apparition (less “magma”, more “aura”).
1974–1977 | Fibres, interlacings, circles
The body returns through fusion: interweavings, torsions, circularities.
Erotic in a cosmic sense: the living as knotting.
1979–1980 | Final unions / appeasement
Works of synthesis: “eye”, couple, maternity, final breath.
Form pacifies without simplifying: it becomes emblem.
Visual markers: halos, spectres, red knots, circles, fusion, circularity, final appeasement.
Overall view in one sentence
1920–1954: from the visible (the world) toward structure (constructed landscape).
1955–1965: form begins to be born (mutation / embryology).
1966–1980: form becomes world (nocturnal/cosmic), then nucleus (halo, fusion, union).